You don’t warn people about a fire and then hand the arsonists a match and a gallon of gasoline. I keep thinking about basketball. The other team is on a fast break—you either get back on defense, take a charge, or commit a hard foul to stop the play. But Schumer? He just stepped aside, let them throw down a windmill dunk, and then watched as Trump gave him a standing ovation on Truth Social.
For weeks, Democratic leaders have insisted that the party’s failure in November stemmed from an overreliance on arguments about protecting democracy and institutions—that to win, they must embrace a more populist, combative approach, one that acknowledges a political system failing the very people it claims to serve. And yet, when faced with an unmistakable populist fight—Trump and Musk systematically dismantling federal agencies—Democrats capitulated, retreating behind procedural justifications even as unions representing federal workers argued for Democrats to vote “No” on the resolution.
This is why voters don’t see Democrats as fighters. When working people look at Washington, they don’t see a party willing to go to the mat for them—they see one that warns about existential threats but refuses to take real risks to stop them. That disconnect isn’t just an optics problem; it’s a credibility crisis, and it’s why so many Americans, even those who despise Trump, are skeptical that Democrats have what it takes to actually stop him.
Schumer’s failure here wasn’t just tactical; it was existential. If Trump’s return to power represents a genuine democratic emergency, then Democrats must act like it—not simply warn us that it’s ten minutes to midnight. Otherwise, they aren’t acting as an opposition party; they are functioning as enablers.
The role of the Democratic Party is not to venerate institutions but to transform them. Institutions are not sacred relics; they are tools, and their value lies in how well they uphold the principles they profess to serve.Democracy was meant to break feudalism. It was never intended as a self-perpetuating system of elite preservation—it was designed to wrest power from the few and distribute it among the many. But today, Trump and Musk are reversing that logic, consolidating power, hollowing out the administrative state, stealing private data, and stripping the public of any meaningful ability to govern itself. This is not just a fight over policy; it’s an effort to render government itself a private commodity.
Chuck Schumer is stuck in 2005. He still believes that if Democrats just wait long enough, if they hold the line and play nice, Republicans will suddenly come to their senses. He actually said that once Trump’s approval drops below 40%, GOP senators will start breaking away. My guy… have you been paying attention for the last eight years?
And yet, Democrats like Schumer still behave as though the system will self-correct, that if they abide by procedural norms long enough and let Trump-Musk exhaust themselves, the fever will break. But the people dismantling democracy aren’t waiting. They are exploiting every available lever of power—hollowing out agencies, capturing the courts, stripping Congress of oversight—at a breakneck pace. The only way to stop an authoritarian advance is to disrupt it, to make every step costly, to slow its march through whatever means necessary. Instead, Schumer is helping smooth the path.
Defending democracy requires more than safeguarding institutions in the abstract—it requires upholding the values those institutions were meant to serve. Right now, we are witnessing Musk’s corporate coup and state capture in real time.
Politics is about know what time it is, and I’m not sure Chuck Schumer has the answer.
Share this post